pearlconcubine:

riotsnotdiets:

suicideblonde:

Among the problems Nabokov’s Lolita poses for the book designer, probably the thorniest is the popular misconception of the title character. She’s chronically miscast as a teenage sexpot—just witness the dozens of soft-core covers over the years. “We are talking about a novel which has child rape at its core,” says John Bertram, an architect and blogger who, three years ago, sponsored a Lolita cover competition asking designers to do better.
Now the contest is being turned into a book, due out in June and coedited by Yuri Leving, with essays on historical cover treatments along with new versions by 60 well-known designers, two-thirds of them women: Barbara deWilde, Jessica Helfand, Peter Mendelsund, and Jennifer Daniel, to name a few. They don’t shy away from frank sexuality, but they add layers of darkness and complication. And like Jamie Keenan’s cover—a claustrophobic room that morphs into a girl in her underwear—they provoke without asking readers to abdicate their responsibility.
(via Recovering Lolita — Imprint-The Online Community for Graphic Designers)

I really love this. I love design that takes this kind of stuff into consideration. 

Great article.  There are some more amazing covers through the link.  

And I really like this one:


favourite book/least favourite pop culture presence
this article is really pretty good, don’t be mislead by the annoying pull quotes

pearlconcubine:

riotsnotdiets:

suicideblonde:

Among the problems Nabokov’s Lolita poses for the book designer, probably the thorniest is the popular misconception of the title character. She’s chronically miscast as a teenage sexpot—just witness the dozens of soft-core covers over the years. “We are talking about a novel which has child rape at its core,” says John Bertram, an architect and blogger who, three years ago, sponsored a Lolita cover competition asking designers to do better.

Now the contest is being turned into a book, due out in June and coedited by Yuri Leving, with essays on historical cover treatments along with new versions by 60 well-known designers, two-thirds of them women: Barbara deWilde, Jessica Helfand, Peter Mendelsund, and Jennifer Daniel, to name a few. They don’t shy away from frank sexuality, but they add layers of darkness and complication. And like Jamie Keenan’s cover—a claustrophobic room that morphs into a girl in her underwear—they provoke without asking readers to abdicate their responsibility.

(via Recovering Lolita — Imprint-The Online Community for Graphic Designers)

I really love this. I love design that takes this kind of stuff into consideration. 

Great article.  There are some more amazing covers through the link.  

And I really like this one:

favourite book/least favourite pop culture presence

this article is really pretty good, don’t be mislead by the annoying pull quotes

Octavia Butler Links

dandelionchild:

eclecticspectrum:

Now most of these are NOT aesthetically pleasing but the content is still there. Let me know if you have a problem with the links. Feel free to pass it along.

Patternist Series

Lilith’s Brood (formerly the Xenogenosis Trilogy)

Parable Series

Standalone Novels

Short Stories

(via note-a-bear)

The Library of Babel

citationneeded:

In any case, it is clear that a library containing all possible books, arranged at random, is equivalent (as a source of information) to a library containing zero books.[citation needed]

Link

I was like “lol, pretty sure this was a borges story” then realised the article was, in fact, about said (really famous) story, and not just a clever connection I’d made

god, I’m a wanker

anyway, this article is really worth reading even if you haven’t read the story.  you should also read the story though. 

"Kate Middleton might be a member of the royal family but that doesn’t make her immune to some good old-fashioned competition! The Duchess of Cambridge just so happens to be in a dead heat with The Hunger Games’ Katniss Everdeen! Both women (though one fictional) have been made into Barbie Dolls and when asked which “person” made the better doll, fans came up in a near tie!"

Kate Middleton in Dead Heat With Katniss Everdeen

this news item is all my christmases at once

theweeklyansible:

Reposted from Fantastic Metropolis, author China Mieville lays out a list of 50 science fiction and fantasy works he feels every socialist ought to read.

Metropolis is THE sci-fi film every thoughtful socialist should watch, though its ultimate conclusion can be described as fascist.

!!!!

(via becoming-wave)

zeruhur:

‘Rights of the Reader’ by Daniel Pennac, and illustrated by Quentin Blake

this is…actually not elitist swill

zeruhur:

‘Rights of the Reader’ by Daniel Pennac, and illustrated by Quentin Blake

this is…actually not elitist swill

squaresome:

Visual Impact

strategic muscle gains!

squaresome:

Visual Impact

strategic muscle gains!

(via desliz:zincfingers:itsinthetrees)

especial snaps to “ADULTERY IS BORING”, “STOP DRINKING AND DOING COKE”, and “MOVE OUR OF BROOKLYN”

by the way, anyone who hasn’t read midnight sun — twilight retold from edward’s perspective, given up by stephenie meyers in a fit of pique after five chapters when someone leaked it — you really should.  it’s quite something.  I recommend it to everyone I know but nobody believes me. 

my five million hunger games posts aside

I actually think it’s generally a good idea to read more than just YA; it’s a good idea to read more than one genre whatever it is.  I get that a lot of literary criticism of YA is snobbish, anti-youth (particularly anti-girl) and puritanically dismissive of the pleasures of a cracking plot. but I’m seeing a lot of people launching huge defenses of YA that edge into an attack on the idea that anyone might find value in difficult or dense reading. 

whatever “challenging yourself” is to you, do that.  like that is a good rule for life in general and engagement with the arts in particular.  this should not be controversial. 

anyway whatever, I can’t tell you what to do, my point is that I will always give whatever monster hit YA series is around a go because a) I usually enjoy it b) it doesn’t take too long c) I’ve realised that YA is a really good wind-down activity, preferable to the internet or tv because of the defined end point of a novel but predominantly d) I really like understanding what everyone is talking about. and it makes me sad when people don’t wanna talk about the cool book I just read and sometimes I need to escape that crushing pain.  there is something to be said for mass culture.