re: neo-pagans whining about the avengers

buttsetcetera:

CAN I JUST SAY that as an authentic norwegian not only do i not care about comic book characters based on the ~gods of my ancestors~, but that if there is one thing regarding norse mythology that’s likely to get me to raise a bit of an eyebrow and put on my true norwegian grumpyface, it’s fucking american neo-pagans who ~practice asatru~ and bang on and on about the norse gods like it’s not just fucking embarrassing for them to claim some kind of connection with a religion that’s been dead for nearly a thousand years.

i mean listen, i won’t pretend these people don’t exist in scandinavia, because they do, and trust me, i am embarrassed, it is embarrassing, but jesus christ, can you people just not? 

because all i see whenever people who are not scandinavian - that is, from actual scandinavia as opposed to ~scandinavian-americans~ - get super into some aspect or other of their ~scandinavian heritage~ - and especially åsatru - is a bunch of creepy white people revelling in their particular brand of super extreme whiteness because they’re convinced it makes them super special. and it creeps me the fuck out. stop trying to base your identity on your own misunderstood ideas about your ~viking heritage~! it’s embarrassing! no one cares! go away!

and i mean, it really doesn’t help that white supremacists are all over åsatru like a goddamn rash, and while i’m sure it sucks to have your particular kind of neo-paganism be so strongly associated with neo nazis when you’re not a neo nazi or white supremacist yourself, i would be a lot more sympathetic towards the plight of misunderstood åsatru neo-pagans if their very existence didn’t creep me out as much as it does. 

IN SUMMARY i literally cannot believe that there are apparently people on tumblr crying cultural appropriation and misrepresentation of their religion because of the goddamn avengers, and also åsatru is a ludicrous excuse for a religion and if you consider yourself to be of this faith then you probably suck. 

I have thought long and hard about this issue and have come to the conclusion that white people who are super into their scandinavian heritage are, on average, about two drinks away from outright neo-nazism

gayinterest:

“PERSPECTIVE”

(Source: )

I can’t decide if “Hunger Games Ryan Gosling” is just another ridiculous crossover for the media oversaturated or the most genius metacommentary on memes ever

so: nerds and how I hate them (or at least hate Nerd Culture) and why. I hate recounting specific events in my personal life, but I hate being pass-ag and vague worse, and the thing I hate the most is not blurting out what I’m thinking to the entire internet, so let’s roll out some necessary context. 

you know Teen Movie Script 3B where the teen girl realises the cool people are dickheads, stops trying to fit in with them, and accepts her true home with the geeks and her new geek boyfriend who’s loved her all along?  ditching the plastics for the mathletes and then HAPPINESS, ACCEPTANCE. 

can we make the opposite movie?  because my high school life got so much better when I got frozen out by my douchey misogynist male nerdy friends (after I started dating someone in their social network and standing up for “vacuous sluts”, i.e. became impossible to parse as an honorary dude) and began prioritising my (already present) friendships with a bunch of popular, pretty, fashionable girls, most of whom went on to go to some form of art school and become well connected in various hip social networks.  these friendships were really supportive and good for me in a time when I was pretty fucked up (not because of social drama but for other reasons).  the interesting thing is that these girls were whip-smart as well as anything else, and also hung out with nerds to start off with in our early teens, but got sick of being constantly harassed and objectified and patronised by nerd boys.  later, when I was eighteen and nineteen, they came with me to feminist events that I wanted to go to and told me they were proud of me when I started organising that shit and supported me in a million other ways, instead of, say, challenging me to give valid, current, and rigorously documented examples of “real” sexism.  I still see these women sometimes.  some I’m still friends with and some I’ve grown apart from, but they’re all awesome. 

girls can be awful to each other but I eventually made peace with almost all the girls in my year, even girls who were very different to me.  and I didn’t consider myself a feminist per se, it wasn’t some kind of big project, it just happened.  this thing that all girls are always involved in complex psychological status anxiety warfare with one another and boys are bewildered on the sidelines is arrant nonsense.

if you were to say “ourcatastrophe is it possible you only felt comfortable in this social circle because you were at that time thin, fashionable, and basically conventionally attractive?” I would have to concede that I don’t know but I’d add that there was more body diversity and general acceptance of difference than you might think.  but if you were to say “ourcatastrophe you are conflating issues, it’s not that you ditched the nerds, it’s that you started learning to prioritise friendships with women” then I would respond: you miss the point, which is that nerd culture is bro-centric as hell, and even if this was not your personal experience you have to admit it is certainly not inherently pro-lady.

what I’m trying to say here is that I am an inherently nerdy (i.e. obsessive, withdrawn, arrogant, science-fiction-loving) girl who found liberation not through embracing that but through expanding my interests and being amenable to changing myself and learning to respect people with different priorities and lifestyles and personal style.  to not condemn cool things as vacuous or not my concern but to withhold judgement and give it a go.   I think that’s actually, fortunately, a very common experience, just one that’s rarely represented well.  I didn’t lose any part of myself through relaxing my intellectual superiority complex and rigidly puritanical sense of authenticity and I doubt that anyone ever will. 

PSA about my most favoritest death hill

galesofnovember:

To create (or reblog) a piece of media attacking a teenage girl artist, accusing her of being vapid and shallow, when her crime is that she created a piece of media attacking another teenage girl for being vapid and shallow is so meta I could just die.  What it is not is thoughtful pop culture analysis. 

edited to include kitten

bam

related: can’t find the relevant posts but saltmarshhag and I think maybe partysoft have also made the point that a lot of criticisms of internalised misogyny rely on the same tired “I’m not like other girls who hate on other girls” brain-breaking circular misogynist critique of internalised misogyny.  it’s just like, girls and women with internalised misogyny issues might in certain contexts be your antagonist, but they’re not your enemy, and there’s not enough recognition of that. 

lookuplookup:

glitterencrustedbunghole:

christinabeee:

Just finished this small illustration of Audrey Horne and Donna Hayward to submit to a Twin Peaks zine, I hope it makes it in! I always wished that more had been done with the relationship between Audrey and Donna, I think they would have made an awesome best friends couple. I really enjoyed those moments when they were solving the mystery of Laura’s murder together!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! this is so fantastic!

Girl Detective Lifestyle Blog

lookuplookup:

glitterencrustedbunghole:

christinabeee:

Just finished this small illustration of Audrey Horne and Donna Hayward to submit to a Twin Peaks zine, I hope it makes it in! I always wished that more had been done with the relationship between Audrey and Donna, I think they would have made an awesome best friends couple. I really enjoyed those moments when they were solving the mystery of Laura’s murder together!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! this is so fantastic!

Girl Detective Lifestyle Blog

"And here’s what I think is so remarkable about the trilogy: The division between public and private life is framed through a manipulation of Katniss’s femininity, but that femininity is seen as a means to an end. The books aren’t so much a critique of the construction of femininity as a critique of the ways it serves the existing power structures. It’s a Marxist/anarchist feminist critique, and though I consider myself neither a Marxist nor an anarchist, I’ll say this: The more material illuminating that feminism exists not because men want to keep women down but because the status quo has an investment in keeping people divided and with diffuse power so as to keep power concentrated where it already is, the better. Katniss is taught to use her “feminine wiles,” but those wiles are exposed for what they are: favor-currying tools that keep women scrambling over false power while the real power lies elsewhere. The manufactured Katniss-Peeta romance only gets the pair to the point where they have to rely on their actual strengths—ingenuity, solidarity, and rebellion. The currency of compliant femininity, in the end, is worth little."

Power, Public Life, and The Hunger Games – The New Inquiry

I’ll probably stop posting Hunger Games reviews pretty soon, but this point just bears repeating. THIS is why these books are so good.

(via becoming-wave)

I’d say that “wiles” and public performance in general are written not so much as worthless, but as necessary yet fickle friends, especially for women. but maybe that’s splitting hairs. 

on that note, let’s talk about what it means that Peeta is so much better at playing to the crowd than Katniss.  (mild spoilers for the rest of the series if you care about that stuff?) it’s like duh, people love him because he is a straight white somewhat class-privileged dude, but also and not disconnectedly because his private and public feelings happen to be pretty similar, i.e. his private feelings are mostly deemed acceptable for public consumption.  he really is a natural extrovert, and really does have a pre-public life long-standing crush on Katniss, whereas she has to play up whatever feelings might be there to the point where she can no longer distinguish the authentic and inauthentic.  that’s some goddamn gender divide in your public performance of desire right there.  (see also: this great article by subanishi on the hunger games and compulsory heterosexuality). 

Peeta rarely actually lies the way Katniss has to.  when he does, he constructs a lie that could be true or is true on a metaphorical level, and draws the strength of his performance from his genuine emotions.  both Haymitch and Katniss keep a lot of information from Peeta when they deem it necessary to ensure that this remains the case.  The more naturally reserved Katniss is not actually that bad at the “concealing information” kind of lying, just at performance; but her performance is a lot more difficult than Peeta’s, so it’s not really a fair comparison.  katniss starts to get better at playing to the crowd when her various managers find a way to do the same for her, i.e. put her in situations where her natural reaction is what they need, and keep the cameras rolling.   but it’s still PR. 

(via becoming-wave)

likeability

leonineantiheroine:

So I know it’s only a TV show and am not using this example of popular culture to like make a connection between it and real life but apparently the next Australian episode of New Girl with the ‘adorkable’ Zooey Deschanel as Jess is significant because Jess finds out someone doesn’t like her. WHY IS THIS ACTUALLY A PROBLEM AND A POINT OF CONFLICT IN A TV SHOW? LIKE SERIOUSLY ARE THERE ACTUALLY PEOPLE IN THE WORLD WHOM EVERYONE LIKES*? WHY DON’T WE REALISE THAT WE ALL HAVE DIFFERENT RELATIONSHIPS TO EACH OTHER AND IT MIGHT NOT BE ABOUT LIKEABILITY PER SE? ISN’T IT FUNNY HOW WOMEN HAVE TO BE MORE LIKEABLE BUT THE MOST LIKEABLE PERSON (IN AUSTRALIA) IS A BIG MOUTH, STRAIGHT WHITE MALE WHO CRACKS JOKES AND IS REALLY LAIDBACK DUDE AND WHO IS NOT FAT (MAYBE)?

*Yes I know there are a few of these but I make it a point not to like them and people who think this is an admirable quality—I don’t like them either.

I find this post highly likeable

sophistory:

PRODUCER: THAT GUY YOU LOVE TO MAKE FISTSHAKE.GIFS ABOUT

STARRING: A MODERATELY ATTRACTIVE WHITE ACTOR, ANOTHER MODERATELY ATTRACTIVE WHITE ACTOR, AND SOME BACKGROUND LADIES I GUESS

SYNOPSIS: WHO GIVES A FUCK

fandom’s new favourite show you guys, txt it

(via galesofnovember)

becoming-wave:

thenewinquiry:

I just finished reading the first book of The Hunger Games.Given my hobbyhorses, it’s probably not surprising that I read it entirely as a novel about the ramifications of having to live as if life is a reality-television show. [UPDATE: Having seen the film, that seems an inescapable…

YES.

ugh katniss’s complicated relationship with performance and authenticity is actually my favourite thing about the hunger games

it’s just hard to talk about without falling into “reality tv is killing our decency!!1!!” territory, when that is a) not interesting and b) not really what the books (or this interesting article) are about