there's our catastrophe

work is its own cure. you have to like it better than being loved.

⚑ ♀

Posts tagged trans

Apr 27

Apr 7

Apr 5

lilacbootlaces:

jane-potter:

“Sylvia Rivera kicking ass on stage after some radfems & transphobes tried to refuse her the right to speak at the 1973 Christopher Street Liberation Day rally. Said radfems then had their own march in part protesting trans participation in Pride. A precursor to today’s Dyke March.”

Source: thespiritwas

It is women like Sylvia Rivera and Marsha P. Johnson who started the Stonewall riots and queer liberation. 43 years later, trans women of color, the people who started the movement, are the people maligned and left behind by it.

In Sylvia’s words, “What the FUCK is wrong with you all?”

[[Trigger warning: suicide]]

Sylvia went home that night and attempted suicide. 

Marsha Johnson came home and found her in time to save her life.

Sylvia left the movement after that day and didn’t come back for twenty years.

this is incredible, she is incredible, I highly recommend watching it

but I think the addendum re: the effect of this day on sylvia is really important

so often we valorise decontextualised moments of tough, articulate resistance and rage

and the suffering of the people who embodied them is not acknowledged, it’s uncomfortable, it’s not inspiring, we want them to stay tough and cool and stylish forever

which is particularly terrible when I think about how sylvia felt like that because of women like me — women who are now watching this video and feeling inspired and impressed and maybe a bit pleased with ourselves for finally having watched a speech by the famous and really cool to name-drop sylvia rivera

(via gabrieldreadnoughthoax)


Mar 28
everythingbutharleyquinn:

OKAY all my cunty references since last night are coming out in the open.
The cool, popular pretty queers (ie a bunch of thin, white, fairly well-off cis people and trans men) in our community, Melbourne and Sydney based, started up this super super secret invite only closed facebook community called DEEP SEA CREATURES all about celebrating “deep lez” and how amazing it is to be a woman and to have a “deep lez” lesbian history.
This basically consists of talking a lot about eating gluten-free vegan food, loving Tegan and Sarah, “womenstruating”, being attracted to wombs (something I noted last night as being, alongside an attraction for other internal organs, something surely only a serial killer would experience?), stanning for transphobic radfems annnnnnnd posting things like the content of the above image.
which, incidentally, was posted by a trans man.
a trans man who is known for having been violent and abusive to his female exes. 
there are more active men in this group than women (and, until last night, NO trans women). men who feel totally free to talk about how great lesbian sex is and how great lesbians are and to post photos of THEMSELVES for admiration and adulation and talk about how connected they are to deep lez history and a lot of stuff about vaginas.
they have also all characterised any criticism of this mindset as being “bullying” and “lesbophobia”.
now I believe lesbophobia is a real thing in queer community and a really shit thing. I also think it’s upheld and implemented by having your LESBIAN GROUP dominated by a bunch of MEN. lesbophobia is NOT being asked to remember trans women lesbians exist and are part of our community. it IS men placing demands on us to not actually identify as lesbian so we will continue to allow men into our spaces… and knickers.
what makes this whole situation worse is that basically ALL of these people are mid to late twenties, they’ve been in queer community for a while, they’ve been prominent in queer community and have been exposed to discussions about transmisogyny before… in fact some of them - like the person who commented on the link in the screencap above - have been called out for transmisogyny in the past and have performed their apologies and their sincere wishes to change their behaviour.
which is exactly WHY this group was created and kept a secret - so they could continue with the same behaviour without anyone being able to call them out on it. in fact there’s an entire thread about how the community has to stay a secret so none of the men involved get questioned about their heavy involvement in a group oriented around lesbian identity*.
but they’re all old enough and experienced enough and exposed enough to know better. in fact have made a huge production of how much better they know now.  but clearly that is all performative and completely insincere.
and you know my fellow cis people, I’m not saying I have never fucked up - I KNOW that I have and will likely continue to do so. in fact some of this deep lez stuff is a part of my actual history (and not just false nostalgia evoked by reading a couple of old books - I’m a fair bit older than most of these people) and I still catch myself speaking in cissexist terms, even after all this time. you know when I was deep-lezzin’ it up at age 18 making goddamn vagina dentata pendants and flogging them on eBay, the word “cissexist” hadn’t even been coined. but even then my social circle included trans women and always has. and whilst I have demonstrated some truly shit cissexist behaviour over the years without a second thought even whilst having significant relationships with trans women, I have learned. sometimes slowly and painfully, but it’s happened. these people have no excuse. I have witnessed many of them be confronted over and over and profess their true apologies and their commitment to change… only to go back to doing the same old thing. it seems the only thing they’ve learned now is not to do this shit publicly.
these people have a lot of social power and sitting around in their little circle jerk perpetuating these ideologies has run-on effects on the rest of the community and it is entirely disingenuous to claim otherwise.
Australia queer community, we are stuck in a loop.  we continually say we want trans women to be included and then repeat the same old shit that ensures their exclusion. we continue to preference and celebrate men and masculinity - including known abusers - and limit the parameters of our attraction to genitals and organs. we continue to perpetuate a concept of identity dominated by whiteness and cisness.
and when conversation is started, we either feign our apologies or further marginalise those people dubbed being “too difficult” for speaking out against the status quo. there is nothing radical or progressive about this process. it is tired, boring and static.
but worse still, it is HURTFUL and actively excluding of people who should feel as naturally and easily a part of queer community as we do. we have just created a hostile environment for fellow queers, which is nothing more than entirely counterproductive to the whole objective of why we build communities at all. 
when men feel more welcome and represented in lesbian community than women do there is something painfully wrong. 
* lesbian identity for who, though? white westerners exclusively it would seem. also, who gets to define the characteristics of what ‘deep’ even is?

everythingbutharleyquinn:

OKAY all my cunty references since last night are coming out in the open.

The cool, popular pretty queers (ie a bunch of thin, white, fairly well-off cis people and trans men) in our community, Melbourne and Sydney based, started up this super super secret invite only closed facebook community called DEEP SEA CREATURES all about celebrating “deep lez” and how amazing it is to be a woman and to have a “deep lez” lesbian history.

This basically consists of talking a lot about eating gluten-free vegan food, loving Tegan and Sarah, “womenstruating”, being attracted to wombs (something I noted last night as being, alongside an attraction for other internal organs, something surely only a serial killer would experience?), stanning for transphobic radfems annnnnnnd posting things like the content of the above image.

which, incidentally, was posted by a trans man.

a trans man who is known for having been violent and abusive to his female exes. 

there are more active men in this group than women (and, until last night, NO trans women). men who feel totally free to talk about how great lesbian sex is and how great lesbians are and to post photos of THEMSELVES for admiration and adulation and talk about how connected they are to deep lez history and a lot of stuff about vaginas.

they have also all characterised any criticism of this mindset as being “bullying” and “lesbophobia”.

now I believe lesbophobia is a real thing in queer community and a really shit thing. I also think it’s upheld and implemented by having your LESBIAN GROUP dominated by a bunch of MEN. lesbophobia is NOT being asked to remember trans women lesbians exist and are part of our community. it IS men placing demands on us to not actually identify as lesbian so we will continue to allow men into our spaces… and knickers.

what makes this whole situation worse is that basically ALL of these people are mid to late twenties, they’ve been in queer community for a while, they’ve been prominent in queer community and have been exposed to discussions about transmisogyny before… in fact some of them - like the person who commented on the link in the screencap above - have been called out for transmisogyny in the past and have performed their apologies and their sincere wishes to change their behaviour.

which is exactly WHY this group was created and kept a secret - so they could continue with the same behaviour without anyone being able to call them out on it. in fact there’s an entire thread about how the community has to stay a secret so none of the men involved get questioned about their heavy involvement in a group oriented around lesbian identity*.

but they’re all old enough and experienced enough and exposed enough to know better. in fact have made a huge production of how much better they know now.  but clearly that is all performative and completely insincere.

and you know my fellow cis people, I’m not saying I have never fucked up - I KNOW that I have and will likely continue to do so. in fact some of this deep lez stuff is a part of my actual history (and not just false nostalgia evoked by reading a couple of old books - I’m a fair bit older than most of these people) and I still catch myself speaking in cissexist terms, even after all this time. you know when I was deep-lezzin’ it up at age 18 making goddamn vagina dentata pendants and flogging them on eBay, the word “cissexist” hadn’t even been coined. but even then my social circle included trans women and always has. and whilst I have demonstrated some truly shit cissexist behaviour over the years without a second thought even whilst having significant relationships with trans women, I have learned. sometimes slowly and painfully, but it’s happened. these people have no excuse. I have witnessed many of them be confronted over and over and profess their true apologies and their commitment to change… only to go back to doing the same old thing. it seems the only thing they’ve learned now is not to do this shit publicly.

these people have a lot of social power and sitting around in their little circle jerk perpetuating these ideologies has run-on effects on the rest of the community and it is entirely disingenuous to claim otherwise.

Australia queer community, we are stuck in a loop.  we continually say we want trans women to be included and then repeat the same old shit that ensures their exclusion. we continue to preference and celebrate men and masculinity - including known abusers - and limit the parameters of our attraction to genitals and organs. we continue to perpetuate a concept of identity dominated by whiteness and cisness.

and when conversation is started, we either feign our apologies or further marginalise those people dubbed being “too difficult” for speaking out against the status quo. there is nothing radical or progressive about this process. it is tired, boring and static.

but worse still, it is HURTFUL and actively excluding of people who should feel as naturally and easily a part of queer community as we do. we have just created a hostile environment for fellow queers, which is nothing more than entirely counterproductive to the whole objective of why we build communities at all. 

when men feel more welcome and represented in lesbian community than women do there is something painfully wrong. 

* lesbian identity for who, though? white westerners exclusively it would seem. also, who gets to define the characteristics of what ‘deep’ even is?

(via mossflowers)


Mar 23

Bitch Please on 3CR Community Radio!

bitchpleasedistro:

Mish from Bitch Please is being interviewed about our rejection from the MCA Zine Fair on Queering The Air, 3-4pm (Syd/Melb time) this Sunday on 3CR Community Radio. 855AM in Melbourne or listen live online!


Mar 21


Dec 3
from the “private lives 2 national survey of glbt health”, australia, 2012.  there are a number of problems with this report, most glaringly here the conceptualisation of cis men and women as simply “male” and “female” and trans men and women as third and fourth genders.  but this is interesting for a number of reasons.  I guess I want to particularly draw people’s attention to the fact that very few of the trans women they surveyed identified as “queer”.  the non-representative sampling method they used makes it unwise to extrapolate too much from this data.  but given that I’ve come into contact with a lot of women who reject labels like “bisexual” and especially “lesbian” in favour of “queer” partly because of concerns about transphobia and gender essentialism, I thought it was worth highlighting this. 

from the “private lives 2 national survey of glbt health”, australia, 2012.  there are a number of problems with this report, most glaringly here the conceptualisation of cis men and women as simply “male” and “female” and trans men and women as third and fourth genders.  but this is interesting for a number of reasons.  I guess I want to particularly draw people’s attention to the fact that very few of the trans women they surveyed identified as “queer”.  the non-representative sampling method they used makes it unwise to extrapolate too much from this data.  but given that I’ve come into contact with a lot of women who reject labels like “bisexual” and especially “lesbian” in favour of “queer” partly because of concerns about transphobia and gender essentialism, I thought it was worth highlighting this. 


Oct 31

darkjez:

In my experience, the use of “folks” has always been pretty common parlance among Southerners generally and Black people especially. As with U.S. American English in general, I think a lot of “social justice”/radical language is heavily influenced by/co-opted from AAVE. 

tightbottomgame asked: I have no idea about why/whether '-folk' is becoming a thing now, but I wonder if its derived in part from 'leatherfolk', which is an (ostensibly) gender-neutral and to a lesser extent sexuality-neutral term for BDSM communities that has been in use several decades (earliest example a quick google turned up was 1984).

that’s interesting.  obviously there’s no automatic link between kink and transness, but it’s possibly one factor in the increased use of “folk” to describe things to do with gender and sexuality.  (& “leatherpeople” does sound frickin weird.)  on the other hand, when you google “leatherfolk + trans” most of the usages of trans are not in the context of the phrase “trans folk”. I’m just really baffled by how and why this became a thing!  linguists and historians, get on it


Page 1 of 5